Political Networks, Ideology and Lobbying
نویسنده
چکیده
We study lobbying with information in a setting where politicians are connected through a network describing information flows. There are two opposing lobby groups, who choose which politician to address. The decision depends on the ideological bias of politicians as well as the overall network structure. We show that there is an interplay between the strength of the network, as given by the information flow, and ideological bias. More precisely, when the information flow in the network is high, the effect of the ideological bias is amplified. Further, the network structure affects whether a priori supporting or opposing politicians are being lobbied. However, it matters not only what ideological biases politicians have, but also whether they are connected with like-minded politicians or politicians with a different ideological bias. "The real puzzle of its [a lobbies] P[ublic]A[ffairs] management is to select the most useful actors to approach, the best connections . . . ". van Schendelen (2010) p. 113.
منابع مشابه
The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation and Administrative Regulation
One of the central concerns about American policy-making institutions is the degree to which political outcomes can be influenced by interested parties. While the literature on interest group strategies in particular institutions– legislative, administrative, and legal–is extensive, there is very little scholarship which examines how the interdependencies between institutions affects the strate...
متن کاملPolitical Ideology Detection Using Recursive Neural Networks
An individual’s words often reveal their political ideology. Existing automated techniques to identify ideology from text focus on bags of words or wordlists, ignoring syntax. Taking inspiration from recent work in sentiment analysis that successfully models the compositional aspect of language, we apply a recursive neural network (RNN) framework to the task of identifying the political positio...
متن کاملThe Pluralistic View of Politics: Asymmetric Lobbyists, Ideological Uncertainty and Political Entry
In a spatial common agency model, two asymmetric interest groups (principals) inuence a unique decision-maker (agent). The decision-maker chooses a onedimensional policy on behalf of those principals and has private information about his ideology after contracting with principals. The policy is always e¢ cient and reects a weighted average between the principals and the agents ideal points....
متن کاملPolitical institutions , lobbying and corruption
Although firms use various strategies to try to influence government policy, with lobbying and corruption chiefly among them, and political institutions play an important role in determining policy choices, very little research has been devoted to these topics. This paper tries to fill this gap. Using cross-country enterprise-level data, it investigates (1) the effect of a key political institu...
متن کاملLobbying Activities of Multinational Firms
This paper investigates if multinationals influence the political process through lobbying more effectively than national firms. First, I introduce a model which contrasts a multinational’s incentives for lobbying with those of a national firm. Then the effect of lobbying on the political decision is analyzed. I conclude that multinationals have smaller incentives to lobby because they have sma...
متن کامل